Thursday, June 19

The Anglican Communion

Did you know that Christ Church Episcopal is a part of a worldwide communion of affiliated churches stretching around the world with over 50 million members? Did you know that the Anglican/Episcopal tradition is the 3rd largest Christian denomination in the world? Did you know that 3 out of 4 members of this communion is a person of color?

From July 12-August 9 at our 5:00 PM Saturday Eucharist, we will be highlighting various parts and traditions of our Anglican Communion. We are calling this series Hope of the Nations: How God is Moving in the World.

On the following dates will focus on:
Saturday, July 12 - The Celtic Tradition
Saturday, July 19 - Haiti
Saturday, July 26 - Southeast Asia
Saturday, August 2 - India
Saturday, August 9 - Liberia

We hope you will join us for this special series in which we will invite guest speakers. In the meanwhile, here are several links to help you learn more about our wide, diverse, and growing communion:


Anglican Communion
Anglican Communion News Service
 


- Jeff

Monday, June 9

List-o-Mania!


David Letterman’s legacy--what is it? Why lists, of course! His Top Ten List on almost any subject under heaven is now thoroughly engrained in American Culture. Daily, one sees magazines, newspapers, and internet sites listing The 5 Worst of this or The 7 Best of that. In that vein I recently came across two such lists that I feel are worthy of passing on.

The first is from a blog hosted by Addie Zierman who blogs about Millennials (basically anyone 30 and under) and the Church. Here is her list of 5 “churchy phrases” that are scaring-off Millennials and each one is followed by her synopsis.


1)  The Bible clearly says


“We’re aware of the Bible’s intricacies. We know the Bible is clear about some things but also that much is not clear and open to interpretation.”

2)  God will never give you more than you can handle.

“Inherent in this phrase is the undertone that if life has become more than you can handle, then your faith must not be strong enough. Too much! We understand that we need help.”

3)Love on ____.

“A kind of creepy phrase with troubling implications...being ‘loved-on’ feels different than simply being loved. The former feels like contrived kindness; the latter is simpler and deeper.”

4)  Black and white quantifiers of faith: like believer, unbeliever, backsliding.

“Millennials are sick of rhetoric that centers around who’s in and who’s out. We know our own doubtful hearts to know that belief and unbelief so often coexist.”


5)  God is in control...has a plan... works in mysterious ways.
“Chances are we believe this is true. But it’s the last thing we want to hear when something goes horribly wrong in our life. We are drawn to the Jesus who cries when Lazarus is found dead... even though he is in control and has a plan to bring Lazarus back to life.”

The second list comes from the ever popular magazine, Real Simple. Its June 2014 issue contains a list of 5 phrases that should be banned from the English language. A brief explanation of the reasoning is included: 

1) It is what it is. Critic John McWhorter says, “It means basically nothing. You’re saying there is nothing to be done about it. When someone is sharing her problems, you can’t have perfect answers, but you should show a little feeling and genuine empathy.”



2) To your point... Nancy Gibbs comments, “This is the worst kind of faux flattery...it pretends to be agreeing while actually contradicting. How about some honesty?”


3) Don’t take this personally. Peggy Newfield: “of course most of us do take it personally. You’re the only one who knows what you think and feel, and you don’t really know what anyone else thinks and feels.”



4) When are you going to ____? “There are so many assumptions baked into this question. It implies that what the other person is doing now isn’t what she should be doing. In regard to life choices this phrase tends to put people on the defensive, and for that reason I would get rid of it,” says Emily Yoffe.



5) No problem. Liv Tyler says, “The phrase is problematic because it is considered negative. It is both impolite and annoying to say, “thank you” and to receive “no problem” in reply. How could a “thank you” be even remotely construed as a problem?



Reporting in,

Jeff